I don't see anything wrong with the K12 program. I think it is great that parents have more than one option to school their children at home.
However, some parents are new to homeschooling and may
misconstrue that the
"free public school" option is the same as
"homeschooling". Yes, the
"free public school" option is
school at home, but it is not
legally "homeschooling." This is why HSLDA does not accept virtual "public school" parents as members. They do not need
legal help to teach their children at home with a virtual
"public school" program.
This is for
informational purposes only, and is in no way a crack against K12. However, if
new homeschoolers are thinking about the "free public school" option, they should be well informed that it does not fall under homeschooling. This way they are not surprised when they are required to follow the state's rules and requirements.
This is considered a virtual public school. Since it is not legally homeschooling (if you choose the free program) you will not have the same freedom as a homeschool family. Meaning...you do what they say.
I was so excited when I heard about this, as well. However, since then I have heard from various homeschoolers, as well as from the Homeschool Defense League, that there is some concern about virtual public schooling... while you certainly have much more control with regards to your child's learning environment and quality of instruction, you are under the public school systems oversight and are expected to follow their curriculum.
Since I am a public school teacher - I do have a few thoughts on this I'd like to share. Yes, I do have State Standards I must follow in my classroom and in addition I have the school district's curriculum to follow. However, I do not feel limited to those standards.
Let me explain: for second grade math I am required to work on base-10 up to millions, addition, subtraction, time, money and measurement. How I choose to cover those are my choice. The District pays for a textbook - but if I wanted to do all hands-on manipulatives, it's up to me. If I am able to whiz through those standards and I wanted to add something in - say multiplication, percents, etc. - I could. Now, dealing with a class of 20 with varying levels and also motivation it sometimes is a struggle to cover it all and cover it well.
If I were to homeschool, I would be glad for the state guidelines but I would also know that if my child were able to handle all those standards, I could either move on to the next grade's standards, or I could chose to cover a particular standard in more depth, or I could choose something all together different to work on.
I like the K-12 virtual homeschool from what I've seen of it and that's the one my state recommends. I also think I read that it's based on the "What Your Child Should Know" series. I think I'd like to know that I was covering the Grade Level Expectation (GLEs) and I would be thrilled if my child could work through it fast enough that I could add in extras or move through it faster.
It seems that homeschoolers have an automatic knee-jerk reaction against anything the state puts out. Honestly, yes the standards are low and you could absolutely surpass them. But I think that they are at least a good sketch of what you should be sure to cover somewhere during your child's education. I think it is very difficult to create your own curriculum from scratch without at least some sort of framework to compare to. Yes, the State will probably require your child to take the standared-based assessment (SBA) - but know that your child will probably pass it in the 90th percentile. And if they don't then oops - maybe you need to go back and review that particular point with your child. I would highly doubt that a homeschooled child would bomb an SBA - and if they do then it would be worth checking whether you covered the material or if there is some other concern to check out.