This is so funny. I haven't been on the BK boards for many months, our lives became very hectic right around February this year. We have been slowly plugging away and putting things to right. I stopped by just to post about Mortensen Math via Crewton Ramones House of Math.I have been using it for a little less than a month now and would be glad to answer any questions you have - as best I can that is. The following is what I was planning to post in a new thread but since this one has already been opened I will post it here:
I just wanted to let everyone know that we finally did pick a math program for the kids and why we picked it.
Most of the math curricula available is good at something. Some programs obviously work better than others. Until now, I felt like we were settling. I can go through the list of stuff I like in different programs, but I am not the kind of person to use 20 different things to get the job done. I have too many kids at home, and we are early educating them all. Most of this stuff just ends up on a shelf collecting dust. Since I prefer to operate on principles rather than on strict lesson plans, what I have been looking for is a “how to do this, and still get your kid to love math”. I am not a great teacher, so I need really good tools.
Last spring I ordered the Jump Math workbook for 1st grade, thumbed through it and realized my kids had already mastered most of the book. We got to that point by playing games, playing with numbers and making it fun. So I just decided that was how I intended to “do math” for the next few years. Play games. Games like Muggins and Mathino, which you can make very easy or very difficult. I didn't think my wish list for a math program was possible. I don’t think it is asking THAT much:
1. I want a program that is consistent with the principles guiding all of my homeschooling. I don’t want my children to just understand English, I want them to love it. We do not study English so my kids can get a good job. We study it because it is beautiful. And because the kids love it, they are also likely to be able to use it well. Shakespeare is infinitely more hire-able than “You want some fries with them there burgers?” So, first and foremost we study math because it is beautiful. I have yet to find a math program that displays the beauty of math. Vedic Math is beautiful, but it is not complete. And there is still no way to teach that to little children. Jump Math is closer to getting there.
2. Ideally, I want something I can use for the next 4-13 years. I would like 13 but that is pushing it. I know.
3. It needs to be easy to teach because I am the teacher.
4. I don’t want to spend thousands of dollars. I have already spent tons of money over the last 13 years looking for the right math program and using a lot of them. And there are programs that cost $100-$200 a year. Or are short lived. So you spend $200 now and then in another 2 years the kids outgrow it and you have to drop another $100 on something else. That is also why I put Jump Math at the top of my “math list”.
5. In the Vedic system of math, you get to know the numbers. After a while you understand how they behave with different operations. Arthur Benjamin uses many Vedic Math principles and had developed some of his own. That is because he has gotten to “know” the numbers and “see” how they work. I want my kids to “know numbers”.
6. I would like the kids to be able to do “real math” not just computation. And at 3 and 4, I still want this to be like playing games and having fun. Much the same way they learned to read.
7. We have to be able to do it without writing. This one should really be listed at the top.
This is a lot to ask of a program. I had given up thinking I would find one. And I am NOT going to mix and match programs. I don’t have enough time in the day for this. I will just drop all of it, for being overwhelmed. Then I found Mortensen Math. Not just Mortensen Math, but Mortensen Math via Crewton Ramone. He is a 24 year master trainer with Mortensen. I don’t know how I first found the program. But I was hooked when I saw his barely graduated from toddlerhood kids factoring equations. I have spent about 30 hours on the site, I bought a password, and have completed all of the teacher training available.
You’ll notice similarities between Math-U-See and Mortensen because the guy who created Math-U-See also worked for Mortensen, and it is sort of like Mortensen, but as far as I can tell has sucked all the joy and beauty out of what Jerry Mortensen created.
I was going to wait to post this until I had some good footage of the kids and what we are doing, and then Crewton posted on his blog that the teacher training is going up and I wanted to let everyone here know about it first. The training is $15. And he is putting up 10 hours of it. For $45 you can get a 2 hour webinar with Jump Math. I am not knocking Jump, I like Jump and think their training is cheap as well. But this is a steal.
My suggestion is that if you are interested, go look around at his site. Do a youtube search on Crewton Ramone: there is only one. And if you like it, don’t wait, get the teacher training. It is going up to $49 soon. And then $79 and then $299. This is the only way that seems feasible to teach 2-4 years olds math. Well, Ella and a few others don’t count. For the rest of us who have real kids and don’t feel comfortable teaching it, this is for you. He will teach you not just how the program works but how to teach it.
What must your kids be able to do before you start?
1. Count to 9. (Though he can help with that.)
2. Tell if things are same of different.
3. Recognize a rectangle.
The videos that got me hooked:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NFVnzDiYW1Qhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZeGKmrPnenMWord of caution: For those of you who want things neat and tidy, his website is going to make you squirm. However, if you had a bad math education, just start clicking through videos. It will clear up a ton of math in your own head. And after awhile you will get a hang of what he is doing. And I did hear through the grapevine that his plan is to make a subscription site with all the stuff organized. How soon that will be? I have no idea. Also, he is very plain spoken and may come off as offensive to some. It would be terrible if you let that get in the way. You won’t find this anywhere else. No one is teaching like this. And it only takes a few youtube searches to see how his boys have developed. You can watch them do trig and factor equations in their heads when they are 7 and 8.
One more issue: Crewton Ramone does not work with Mortensen anymore. And if you get the Mortensen blocks new you may have to wait awhile to get them - like 6-8 weeks. You can use Math-U-See; I have a set. You can pick some up on ebay cheap. We have both sets of blocks. Math-U-See and Mortensen. I bought the Mortensen on ebay. It took about 2 weeks to get what I wanted. Anyway, the Mortensen blocks are much better blocks. They feel like Legos in your hand. The Math-U-See ones are made of a softer plastic. You will notice, in the last video, his boys building stuff out of the blocks. That won’t happen with the Math-U-See blocks. Or at least it doesn’t happen with ours. The blocks warp, don’t stick together well and the towers fall down. This is very frustrating to 3 and 4 year olds. But if that is what you have, by all means use them. Don’t wait to start just because you don’t have the right blocks. You can even use Cuisenaire rods. And I have a template I made for paper ones to use before we got our blocks. If you want it, I will gladly give it to you.
http://www.crewtonramoneshouseofmath.com/teacher training
http://www.crewtonramoneshouseofmath.com/parents-teachers.htmlHow is it working for us? The little girl that I care for who has Down Syndrome understands and is working on squares and square roots. She is still 5. Today, we were working on some simple algebra. She factored very quickly x2 + 4x+3, but she had a bit of trouble making a rectangle and needed help. My four year old still has difficulty sitting, so he builds towers and knocks them over. What is he doing while playing smash the cars? Addends. He is getting pretty good at them.
EDIT: that is supposed to be x squared, but the superscript didn't come through.