lzp11, You are very welcome.
ariel, I agree that the RightStart Mathematics program is expensive. You should try getting it shipped to Australia!
I must say that it has been worth the cost. We started at Level B and I am planning to order Level C during the next couple of months and start working on it with my daughter in the second half of this year.
Also, I have probably saved a fortune since we started RightStart as I am no longer tempted by other math activity books or manipulatives (which can quickly add up) because I know that my daughter is getting a lot of benefit from using RightStart and she truly understands and enjoys our lessons. And there is very little preparation for me before a lesson – the occasional photocopying of a game sheet, once I made some Australian coins out of cardboard and modified a few related lesson plans, gathering toys or the supplied cards for games. Generally I just grab the items in the supplies list at the top of the lesson plan and then sit right down with my daughter without having read through the lesson.
I love it!
The RightStart abacus is specifically designed for the program so you probably wouldn’t be able to just purchase it alone and get the same benefits. I think a child would need to understand 1s, 10s, 100s and so on (which are so clear on the style of abacus like the one used in RightStart which I wrongly thought of as very babyish before seeing how powerful the two-coloured RightStart abacus is), then be introduced to the Japanese abacus.
The student does not use the RightStart Mathematics book, the teacher does. The student does very little writing which is one reason I am using it for my son at 3 years of age. He is a brilliant reader and has had an introduction to math thanks to LM and Doman, but is not a strong writer.
The student sings, plays finger games, plays with toys, plays with the abacus, plays with counters, plays card games, plays board games, plays with shapes….. Plays, plays, plays rather than completes worksheets. There are worksheets, but only a few, and I’m going to incorporate stickers into those lessons so my son will have a blast doing them. When my daughter was 4 and 5 I made up equation questions about fairies, princesses and unicorns with lots of coloured pictures thrown in to make the worksheets more fun.
The student does use books with the Learning Mathematics with the Abacus program, but you can control how much by doing all of the exercises along with them on your own abacus. The books definitely wouldn’t appeal to a 2 year old. The Activity Book is a very plain black and white book and the Text Book is only slightly more appealing. I’m probably not going to introduce the Japanese abacus to my son before he is 5, even though he wants to have his turn now. Also, it is not very strong so I’m afraid he’ll break it.
The Learning Mathematics with the Abacus does teach math while learning to use the Japanese abacus, but I would not use this program alone to teach a child math. As much as we like learning our Japanese abacus with this program, I am convinced that my daughter would not have the same excellent grasp of math if I had started her math journey with this program. RightStart is far more comprehensive.
I hope that this helps.
Mum.